Advances in Social Behavior Research

Advances in Social Behavior Research

Vol. 2, 01 March 2023


Open Access | Article

The Impact of Gender Bias in Social Media on Women's Job Development

Yilan Ruan * 1 , Naier Zhong 2
1 University of California, Irvin
2 RDF International School

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Advances in Humanities Research, Vol. 2, 192-197
Published 01 March 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Yilan Ruan, Naier Zhong. The Impact of Gender Bias in Social Media on Women's Job Development. LNEP (2023) Vol. 2: 192-197. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/2/2022404.

Abstract

With the development of the Internet, social media has gradually become the main way for people to find jobs. However, such a job search method is not absolutely fair. On the contrary, women suffer from gender bias in every way. This article aims to specifically discuss similar gender biases and their distress and potential risks to women from three aspects.

Keywords

Gender Bias, job development, social media

References

1. Askehave, Inger, and Karen Korning Zethsen. "Gendered Constructions of Leadership in Danish Job Advertisements." Gender, Work & Organization 21.6 (2014): 531-545.

2. Bhargava, H.K., & Feng, J. (2002). Paid placement strategies for internet search engines. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 117–123). New York: ACM.

3. Bosak, J. and Sczesny, S. (2008) Am I the right candidate? Self-ascribed fit of women and men to a leadership position. Sex Roles, 58, 682–688.

4. Chowdhury, Afra Rahman, et al. "Reflections of employers' gender preferences in job ads in India: an analysis of online job portal data." World Bank Policy Research Work-ing Paper 8379 (2018).

5. Correll, Shelley J. 2004. ”Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status and Emerging Career Aspirations.” American Sociolgical Review 69:93–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 000312240406900106

6. England, Paula. 2005. ”Gender Inequality in Labor Markets: The Role of Motherhood and Segregation.” Social Politics 12:264–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi014

7. England, Paula, and Su Li. 2006. ”Desegregation Stalled: The Changing Gender Composition of College Majors, 1971–2002.” Gender and Society 20:657–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0891243206290753

8. England, Paula. 2010. ”The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.” Gender and Society 24:149–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475

9. Jia, Sen, Thomas Lansdall-Welfare, Saatviga Sudhahar, Cynthia Carter, and Nello Cristianini. 2016. ”Women Are Seen More Than Heard in Online Newspapers.” PLOS One 11: e0148434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148434

10. Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.

11. Macharia, Sarah. 2015. ”Global Media Monitoring Project 2015.” World Association of Christian Communictaion. http://cdn.agilitycms.com/who-makes-the-news/Imported/reports_2015/global/gmmp_global_report_en.pdf

12. Madden, Janice Fanning. 2012. ”Performance-Support Bias and the Gender Pay Gap Among Stockbrokers.” Gender and Society 26:488–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0891243212438546

13. Rasul, S. (2009). Gender stereotypes in thelanguage of Pakistani newspapers. In Proceed ings, 8th InternationalConference on Language and Development (pp. 1–18). Bang ladesh.

14. Reskin, Barabara. 2003. “including Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality: 2002 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Review 68:1-21. https;//doi.org/10.2307/3088900

15. Reskin, Barabara F., and Denise D. Bielby. 2005. ”A Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes.” Journal oF economic Perspectives 19:71-86. https://doi.org/10/1257/0895330053148010

16. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2013. ”Why Status Matters for Inequality.” American Sociolgical Review 79:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413515997

17. Ross, Karen. 2009. Gendered Media: Women, Men, and Identity Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers

18. Shor, Eran, Arnout van de Rijt, Alex Miltsov, Vivek Kulkarni, and Steven Skiena. 2015. ”A Paper Ceiling: What Explains the Sex-Ratio Inequality in Printed News Coverage?”

19. American Sociological Review 80:960–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415596999 Shor, Eran, Arnout van de Rijt, and Alex Miltsov. 2019. ”Do Women in the Newsroom

20. Make a Difference? Sentiment toward Women and Men as a Function of Newsroom Composition.” Sex Roles 81:44–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0975-8

21. Shor, Eran, Arnout Van De Rijt, and Babak Fotouhi. "A large-scale test of gender bias in the media." Sociological science 6 (2019): 526-550.

22. Singh, Vivek K., et al. "Female librarians and male computer programmers? Gender bias in occupational images on digital media platforms." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71.11 (2020): 1281-1294.

23. Smith, Ryan A. 2002. ”Race, Gender, and Authority in the Workplace: Theory and Re- search.” Annual Review of Sociology 28:509–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc. 28.110601.141048

24. Tang, Shiliang, et al. “Gender bias in the job. market: A longitudinal analysis.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1.CSCW (2017):1-19

25. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved from. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022), Part I
ISBN (Print)
978-1-915371-07-2
ISBN (Online)
978-1-915371-08-9
Published Date
01 March 2023
Series
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
ISSN (Print)
2753-7048
ISSN (Online)
2753-7056
DOI
10.54254/2753-7048/2/2022404
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated