Advances in Social Behavior Research

Advances in Social Behavior Research

Vol. 2, 01 March 2023

Open Access | Article

The Role of Gender in Perceiving Emotions: Anger and Sadness

Meixuan Chen * 1
1 Indian Springs School, Pelham, Alabama 35124, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Advances in Humanities Research, Vol. 2, 156-162
Published 01 March 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Meixuan Chen. The Role of Gender in Perceiving Emotions: Anger and Sadness. LNEP (2023) Vol. 2: 156-162. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/2/2022375.

Abstract

This paper focused on the relationship between gender and emotion. It had been stereotyped that woman would sense more sadness than men when facing sad situations, while men would be more outraged than women in angry circumstances. To test our hypothesis, this work recruited a total sample size of 420 people to watch two video clips (angry and sad videos) and completed a survey about the pictures. Their emotional states were unconsciously reflected by their attitudes towards the video clips. Excel and a t-test were implemented to analyze the emotional differences between males and females under each condition (sadness and anger). The result corresponded to our speculation–women tended to feel more despairing than men when watching sad video clips, while men tended to be more irritated than women after watching angry videos.

Keywords

abstract image, irritation(men), response towards video, desperation (women)

References

1. [1] Domestic Violence Statistics. Shelter House. (2016, December 27). Retrieved November 14, 2021, from http://www.shelterhousenwfl.org/resources/domestic-violence-statistics/

2. [2] Wang, C. L. (2008). Gender differences in responding to sad emotional appeal: A moderated mediation explanation. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 19(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1300/j054v19n01_03

3. [3] Reevy, G. M., & Maslach, C. (2001). Use of Social Support: Gender and Personality Differences. Sex Roles, 44(7/8), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011930128829

4. [4] Choti, S. E., Marston, A. R., Holston, S. G., & Hart, J. T. (1987). Gender and personality variables in film-induced sadness and crying. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5(4), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1987.5.4.535

5. [5] Brody, L. R. (2010). Gender and emotion: Beyond stereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 53(2), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02448.x

6. [6] Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429

7. [7] Peter, M., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., & Van Heck, G. L. (2001). Personality, gender, and crying. European Journal of Personality, 15(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.386

8. [8] Campbell, A. and Muncer, S. (2008), Intent to harm or injure? Gender and the expression of anger. Aggr. Behav., 34: 282-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20228

9. [9] Kelly, J. R., & Hutson-Comeaux, S. L. (1999). Sex Roles, 40(1/2), 107–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018834501996

10. [10] Else-Quest, N. M., Higgins, A., Allison, C., & Morton, L. C. (2012). Gender differences in self- conscious emotional experience: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 947–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027930

11. [11] Erdfelder, E., Faul, F. & Buchner, A. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1–11 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630

12. [12] Gregory Bartoszek & Daniel Cervone (2017) Toward an implicit measure of emotions: ratings of abstract images reveal distinct emotional states, Cognition and Emotion, 31:7, 1377-1391, DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1225004

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022), Part I
ISBN (Print)
978-1-915371-07-2
ISBN (Online)
978-1-915371-08-9
Published Date
01 March 2023
Series
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
ISSN (Print)
2753-7048
ISSN (Online)
2753-7056
DOI
10.54254/2753-7048/2/2022375
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated