ASBR ICEIPI 2022, 03 March 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nowadays, COVID - 19 outbreak still exists throughout the world and seriously affects people's lives, since the new crown vaccine on all kinds of media information about the vaccine, and people also never stopped, the discussions of the vaccine in this paper, the authors take the form of a random questionnaire, exploring a certain number of people. This paper investigated the relationship between the public’s cognitive demand for vaccine information and attention level on the amount of vaccine knowledge they acquire and the degree of relevant thinking, and used the Cognitive Mediation Model (CMM) to conduct a series of data analyses, and observe some phenomena. For example, the public’s perception of vaccine information demand positively related to public attention, focus on epidemic information level, and the relationship between the public’s perception of vaccine information demand was positively associated with the degree of involvement with the public to think. The public of vaccine information and relational thinking levels was positively related to the level of attention level and public attention to vaccine information for vaccine utility were positively correlated
Model, Public, Theory., Cognitive, Cognition, Vaccine, Media, COVID-19
1. Jiang Y.Z., Zhang W.B, He S.Y., Zhu Y.W., Wang Y.Y., Wang, N. Cai J., (2022) Analysis of stress status and influencing factors of psychological counselors in the early stage of COVID-19 in Shanghai, Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1, 11.
2. Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2002). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28(5), 571–601.
3. Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177–193.
4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
5. Reiss, S. (2004) Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of General Psychology, 179 – 193.
6. Chaffee, S. H., Schleuder, J. (1986) Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76 – 107.
7. Ho, S. S., Peh, X., & Soh, V. W. L. (2013) The cognitive mediation model: Factors influencing public knowledge of the H1N1 pandemic and intention to take precautionary behaviors. Journal of Health Communication, 18(7), 773–794.
8. Lee, C.-J., Zhao, X., & Pena-y-Lillo, M. (2016) Theorizing the pathways from seeking and scanning to mammography screening. Health Communication, 31(1), 117–128.
9. Zhang L.L., Yang X.D. (2021) Linking risk perception to a willingness to check for breast cancer in China: testing the cognitive mediation model of adaptation Health communication Volume, Health Communication, 36, 14.
10. Jensen, J. D. (2011) Knowledge acquisition following exposure to cancer news articles: A test of the cognitive mediation model. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 514–534.
11. Ho S. S, Peh X.H.g, Soh V., W. L. (2013) The Cognitive Mediation Model: Factors Influencing Public Knowledge of the H1N1 Pandemic and Intention to Take Precautionary Behaviors journal of health communication, Journal of Health Communication, 18, 773-794.
12. MC H., SE C., O P., ME P. (2013) A cognitive-behavioral model of problematic online gaming in adolescents aged 12–22 years Computers in Human Behavior January, Issue 1, Pages 202-209.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).