ASBR ICEIPI 2022, 03 March 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper is a detailed analysis of how socialist thinking can help International Health Organizations. WHO's health system is of great importance to people all over the world, and it holds a key position in the deal with international relations. But judging from the examples of the effects of various transnational epidemics discussed in this article, the current WHO health system is inadequate for this vital responsibility and fails to handle international relations well. This paper will give a detailed explanation of why WHO needs to apply socialist thought and argue the excellence of socialist thought in helping WHO better deal with international relations and international health issues. The deficiencies of WHO's health system are directly reflected in its policies. This paper will demonstrate how reforming WHO's policies with socialist ideology will improve international relations and better deal with international health issues.
international relations, world health organization, policy, socialism, health system
1. Alhammadi, Abdullah. “THE NEOREALISM AND NEOLIBERALISM BEHIND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DURING COVID-19.” World Affairs (Washington), vol. 185, no. 1, 2022, pp. 159–164, https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200211065128.
2. Davies, Sara E., and Clare Wenham. “Why the COVID-19 Response Needs International Relations.” International Affairs, vol. 96, no. 5, 2020, pp.1227–51, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa135.
3. Gupta, Nippun, et al. “COVID-19 Pandemic and Reimagination of Multilateralism through Global Health Diplomacy.” Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 20, 2021, p. 11551–, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011551.
4. Hunter, Jack. 2021. “India Covid Aid: Is Emergency Relief Reaching Those in Need?”BBC News, May 6. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-56999104
5. Aslam, Muhammad Z., et al. “Establishing a Sustainable Healthcare Environment in Low‐and Middle‐income Countries.” BJU International, vol. 129, no. 2, 2022, pp. 134–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15659.
6. Weible, Christopher M., et al. “COVID-19 and the Policy Sciences: Initial Reactions and Perspectives.” Policy Sciences, vol. 53, no. 2, 2020, pp. 225–41, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4.
7. BBC News. “Coronavirus: Trump Accuses WHO of Being a ‘Puppet of China’.” BBC.com, May 19. 2020 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52679329
8. Lee, Sook Jong. “COVID-19 Infects International Organisations.” East Asia Forum No. 21/2020. 2020 https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/04/21/COVID-19-infects-international-organisations/
9. What has the World Health Organization done for us? Nat. Microbiol 5, 977 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0772-3
10. Beigbeder, Yves. The World Health Organization: Achievements and Failures. Routledge, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315551401.
11. Worldometers. 2021. “Coronavirus Death Toll.” Worldometers No. 26/2021 https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-toll/
12. Siddiqui, Kalim. “One Belt and One Road, China’s Massive Infrastructure Project to Boost Trade and Economy: An Overview.” International Critical Thought, vol. 9, no. 2, 2019, pp. 214–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2019.1613921.
13. David S. Pena. “BEYOND BOURGEOIS LIBERALIZATION: A PATHWAY TO THE FUTURE OF SOCIALISM.” World Review of Political Economy, vol. 3, no. 2, 2012, pp. 153–76.
14. Gaffney, Adam, et al. “COVID-19 and US Health Financing: Perils and Possibilities.” International Journal of Health Services, vol. 50, no. 4, 2020, pp. 396–407, https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731420931431.
15. Matthewman, Steve, and Kate Huppatz. “A Sociology of Covid-19.” Journal of Sociology (Melbourne, Vic.), vol. 56, no. 4, 2020, pp. 675–83, https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783320939416.
16. Bennhold, Katrin, and David E. Sanger. “U.S. Offered ‘Large Sum’ to German Company for Access to Coronavirus Vaccine Research, German Officials Say.” New York Times, March 15. 2020 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/15/world/europe/cornonavirus-vaccine-us-germany.html
17. Boin, A., & ’t Hart, P. Organising for efective emergency management: Lessons from research. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4), 357–371. 2010
18. Basrur, Rajesh, and Frederick Kliem. 2021. “COVID-19 and International Cooperation: IR Paradigms at Odds.” SN Social Sciences 1 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00006-4.
19. Balakrishnan, Pulapre, and Sreenath K. Namboodhiry. “The Importance of Investing in a Public Health System: Evidence from COVID-19 Mortality.” Indian Economic Review, vol. 56, no. 1, 2021, pp. 233–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41775-021-00116-7.
20. Cohen, Jon.“WHO Says No Need—Yet—to Declare Spread of Novel Virus is as International Emergency. Critics of Decision See Global Threat from a Coronavirus that Emerged in China Last Month and hasJumped to Several Countries.”Science No. 22/2020. 2020.https://www.science.org/news/2020/01/who-saysno-need-yet-declare-spread-novel-virus-international-emergency
21. WHO. “WHO Global Health for Peace Initiative (GHPI)”. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/initiatives/who-health-and-peace-initiative
22. Velásquez, G. (2020 November). “The World Health Organization Reforms in the Time of COVID-19”. South Centre Research Paper 121. https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/RP-121-rev2.pdf.
23. Redacción. “The United States withdraws from the WHO: Trump officially notifies the United Nations of his country's departure.” BBC.com, July 7. 2020. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-53329647
24. 24. Venter, Fouche Hendrik Johannes, and Jaqueline Elizabeth Wolfaardt. “The World Health Organization’s Mechanisms for Increasing the Health Sector Budget: The South African Context.” SAMJ: South African Medical Journal, vol. 106, no. 8, 2016, pp. 771–74, https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i8.10654.
25. WHO. “Political declaration of the third high-level meeting of the General Assembly on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases.” World Health Organization. EB150/7 Add.1. January 11. 2022. https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB150/B150_7Add1-en.pdf
26. WHO. “Seventy-fifth World Health Assembly – Daily update: 27 May 2022.” World Health Organization. May 27. 2022.https://www.who.int/zh/news/item/27-05-2022-seventy-fifth-world-health-assembly---daily-update--27-may-2022
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).