ASBR ICEIPI 2022, 02 February 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Irony can be defined as words that express something other than, and usually intending the opposite of, the literal meaning. Irony is used in different kinds of conditions to criticize, tease or praise others. Irony comprehension is the process of identifying irony and detecting its implied meaning. This article discusses different predictive mental processing of irony comprehension and introduces the factors that affect irony comprehension in existing research. At the end, this article points out limitations of existing research and put forwards some possible improvements in future study.
Irony comprehension, Influencing factors, Irony, Predictive processing
1. Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of pragmatics, 32(6):793-826.
2. Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of pragmatics, 59:40-56.
3. Zajączkowska, M., Abbot-Smith, K. (2020). “Sure I’ll help—I’ve just been sitting around doing nothing at school all day”: Cognitive flexibility and child irony interpretation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 199:104942.
4. Gibbs, R. W., Colston, H. L. (Eds.). (2007). Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. Psychology Press.
5. Dews, S., Kaplan, J., Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse processes, 19(3): 347-367.
6. Zhang, M. Zhang, J. J. (2006) Effects of intonation on 6 to 10-year-old children’s cognition of different types of irony. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38(2):197-206.
7. Baptista, N. I., Manfredi, M., Boggio, P. S. (2018). Medial prefrontal cortex stimulation modulates irony processing as indexed by the N400. Social neuroscience, 13(4):495-510.
8. Dews S. Winner E, Kaplan J, et al. (1996) Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development, 67(6): 3071-3085.
9. Zhang, D. (2019). Roles of Sentence Final Particles and Prosody in Irony Comprehension of ASD Children. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(1):18-23.
10. Fabry, R. E. (2021). Getting it: A predictive processing approach to irony comprehension. Synthese,198(7): 6455-6489.
11. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. pp. 41-58.
12. Wilson, D., Sperber, D. (2002). Relevance theory. In G. Ward and L. Horn (Eds) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Olkoniemi, H., Kaakinen, J. K. (2021). Processing of irony in text: A systematic review of eye-tracking studies. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 75(2): 99–106.
14. Winner, E., Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker's second‐order intention. British journal of developmental psychology, 9(2): 257-270.
15. Kreuz, R. J., Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of experimental psychology: General: 118(4), 374.
16. Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?. Lingua, 116(10):1722-1743.
17. Clark, H. H., Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1): 121–126.
18. Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19(2): 239-264.
19. Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General: 124(1), 3.
20. Winner, E., Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker's second‐order intention. British journal of developmental psychology, 9(2): 257-270.
21. Giora, R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of pragmatics, 31(7): 919-929.
22. Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., ...Smarsh, B. (1996). Children's understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child development, 67(6): 3071-3085.
23. Ackerman, B. P. (1986). Children's sensitivity to comprehension failure in interpreting a nonliteral use of an utterance. Child Development, 485-497.
24. Wang, S. A. (2016). The Effect of Language Proficiency on Irony Comprehension. Journal of HUBEI Correspondence University, 29(20): 85-86.
25. Ellis, R., Zhu, Y., Shintani, N., & Roever, C. (2021). A study of Chinese learners’ ability to comprehend irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 172:7-20.
26. Ding, F., Wu, W.,(2016). The influence of sentence collocation and irony types on pupils’ irony comprehension in different contexts. Youth and Adolescent Studies, 5: 29-34.
27. Slugoski, B. R., Turnbull, W. (1988). Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7(2): 101-121.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).